<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Noise Reduction on Television?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.woolyinc.com/noise-reduction/digital-noise-reduction-on-television/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.woolyinc.com/noise-reduction/digital-noise-reduction-on-television</link>
	<description>Sound Barriers and Noise Reduction for Home Music Studios</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 09:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gp4rts</title>
		<link>http://www.woolyinc.com/noise-reduction/digital-noise-reduction-on-television/comment-page-1#comment-3433</link>
		<dc:creator>gp4rts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woolyinc.com/noise-reduction/digital-noise-reduction-on-television#comment-3433</guid>
		<description>If the original source material is very noisy (like from an old film or TV program that has been digitized) and it bothers you, try adding a small amount of DNR.  The softer picture may be more pleasing than the noisy one.  In all other cases, it should be OFF,&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the original source material is very noisy (like from an old film or TV program that has been digitized) and it bothers you, try adding a small amount of DNR.  The softer picture may be more pleasing than the noisy one.  In all other cases, it should be OFF,<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OSMR2Rabbits</title>
		<link>http://www.woolyinc.com/noise-reduction/digital-noise-reduction-on-television/comment-page-1#comment-3432</link>
		<dc:creator>OSMR2Rabbits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woolyinc.com/noise-reduction/digital-noise-reduction-on-television#comment-3432</guid>
		<description>I agree that in most situations you don't want to turn that feature on.  For analog signals in fringe areas, it is a decent feature, but for digital tv it does not make sense.  If you are using digital channels, leave it OFF.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that in most situations you don&#8217;t want to turn that feature on.  For analog signals in fringe areas, it is a decent feature, but for digital tv it does not make sense.  If you are using digital channels, leave it OFF.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashram</title>
		<link>http://www.woolyinc.com/noise-reduction/digital-noise-reduction-on-television/comment-page-1#comment-3431</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.woolyinc.com/noise-reduction/digital-noise-reduction-on-television#comment-3431</guid>
		<description>Turn it off.

Digital noise reduction is what it suggests: a form of processing to reduce perceived visual noise in the picture.

But many visual noise reduction systems don't really do a good job at reducing visual noise anyways and may also compromise the actual resolution of the picture.

It's also an additional processing step that can be avoided to maintain signal purity as much as possible.  

It's a superfluous feature.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turn it off.</p>
<p>Digital noise reduction is what it suggests: a form of processing to reduce perceived visual noise in the picture.</p>
<p>But many visual noise reduction systems don&#8217;t really do a good job at reducing visual noise anyways and may also compromise the actual resolution of the picture.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also an additional processing step that can be avoided to maintain signal purity as much as possible.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a superfluous feature.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

